Abstract
AbstractIt is argued here that the wet‐surface temperature (Tws) estimation method employed by Tu and Yang for their potential evaporation estimates yields physically unreachable low values not only during dry, but frequently under wet environmental conditions as well. For these reasons it is claimed that the wet‐surface temperature estimation method of Szilagyi and Jozsa (2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.008) may produce more realistic Tws values than the one by Yang and Roderick (2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481) as employed by Tu and Yang (2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031486).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
