Abstract
In this comment we show that the claims by Cassidy et al (J Math Chem 56: 477, 2018) about the limitations of the Riccati Pade method (RPM) are unfounded. To this end we compare the performance of the RPM and their DESCM by means of the calculation of the eigenvalues of a class of one-dimensional potentials. We show that the RPM is simple and extremely accurate. In addition to the exponential convergence of its approximate eigenvalues the RPM does not require any variable transformation, adjustable parameters or scaling that are necessary for the improvement of the performance of the DESCM. An additional remarkable feature of the RPM is that it provides upper and lower bounds to the eigenvalues of the perturbed Coulomb potentials chosen for this test.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
