Abstract
<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Exact nuclear Overhauser enhancement (eNOE) yields highly accurate, ensemble averaged <span class="inline-formula"><sup>1</sup></span>Hâ<span class="inline-formula"><sup>1</sup></span>H distance restraints with an accuracy of up to 0.1âà for the multi-state structure determination of proteins as well as for nuclear magnetic resonance molecular replacement (<span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i></span>MR<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>) to determine the structure of the proteinâligand interaction site in a time-efficient manner. However, in the latter application, the acquired eNOEs lack the obtainable precision of 0.1âà because of the asymmetrical nature of the filtered nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (NOESY) experiment used in <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i></span>MR<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>. This error is further propagated to the eNOE equations used to fit and extract the distance restraints. In this work, a new analysis method is proposed to obtain inter-molecular distance restraints from the filtered NOESY spectrum more accurately and intuitively by dividing the NOE cross peak by the corresponding diagonal peak of the ligand. The method termed diagonal-normalised eNOEs was tested on the data acquired by <span class="cit" id="xref_text.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx16">Torres et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx16">2020</a>)</span> on the complex of PIN1 and a small, weak-binding phenylimidazole fragment. <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i></span>MR<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> calculations performed using the distances derived from diagonal-normalised eNOEs yielded the right orientation of the fragment in the binding pocket and produced a structure that more closely resembles the benchmark X-ray structure (2XP6) <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.2">(<a href="#bib1.bibx12">Potter et al.</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx12">2010</a>)</span> with an average heavy-atom root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 1.681âà with respect to it, when compared to the one produced with traditional <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i></span>MR<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> with an average heavy atom RMSD of 3.628âà . This is attributed to the higher precision of the evaluated distance restraints.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.