Abstract
A recent publication describes results obtained by in-beam $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray spectroscopy of excited states of $^{92}\mathrm{Rh}$ and concludes, by mainly using extrapolated $Q$ values, that the previously reported direct two-proton decay of $^{94}\mathrm{Ag}$ (${21}^{+}$) to $^{92}\mathrm{Rh}$ is very difficult to reconcile with the $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray data. We present evidence that this conclusion may be misleading.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
