Abstract
This comment points out errors in the analysis of 61 magnetic hyperfine structure (A) constants of Co II energy levels by Fu et al. [JQSRT 2021, 107590]. The paper was published without full awareness of the extensive literature already available for Co II hyperfine A constants at the time; 57 of 58 A constants that were claimed to have been measured for the first time had already been measured by the prior work of Ding and Pickering [ApJS 2020, 251:24], who had published A constants for 292 levels of Co II. The A constant of 3d64s2 a5D4 has been determined by Fu et al. [JQSRT 2021, 107590] for the first time to be 12.0±1.8 mK (1 mK = 0.001 cm−1), which was found to agree with line profiles observed by Ding and Pickering [ApJS 2020, 251:24]. Discrepancies in 17 A constants of Fu et al. [JQSRT 2021, 107590] were found, which are likely due to the analysis of weak, experimentally unclassified transitions with Ritz wavenumbers 25453.966 cm−1 and 25149.948 cm−1 by Fu et al. [JQSRT 2021, 107590] for the A constants of the energy levels 3d7(2G)4s a3G5 and 3d7(2P)4s c3P2 respectively. Fewer transitions and poorer quality spectra analysed by Fu et al. [JQSRT 2021, 107590] are also concluded to have contributed to disagreements in the 17 A constants.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.