Abstract
AbstractWeather forecasting models coupled with canopy layer schemes are frequently used to assess the urban heat island (UHI) phenomenon through sensitivity analysis. These models are valuable tools if they are properly tested against field observations. Mughal et al. (2019) (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029796) followed this approach to investigate Singapore's UHI effect within the urban canopy layer. But a lack of field observations for evaluating the model's performance led to simplistic assumptions and wrong interpretations. The major flaws triggered by both circumstances are exposed with the aim that future research does not repeat the same mistakes and can provide the scientific basis to formulate effective mitigation measures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
