Abstract
<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> While the variations of tidal range are large and fairly well known across Australia (less than 1â<span class="inline-formula">m</span> near Perth but more than 14â<span class="inline-formula">m</span> in King Sound), the properties of the tidal currents are not. We describe a new regional model of Australian tides and assess it against a validation dataset comprising tidal height and velocity constituents at 615 tide gauge sites and 95 current meter sites. The model is a barotropic implementation of COMPAS, an unstructured-grid primitive-equation model that is forced at the open boundaries by TPXO9v1. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the modelled M2 height amplitude is 8.8â<span class="inline-formula">cm</span>, or 12â% of the 73â<span class="inline-formula">cm</span> mean observed amplitude. The MAE of phase (10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>â</sup></span>), however, is significant, so the M2 mean magnitude of vector error (MMVE, 18.2â<span class="inline-formula">cm</span>) is significantly greater. The root sum square over the eight major constituents is 26â% of the observed amplitude. We conclude that while the model has skill at height in all regions, there is definitely room for improvement (especially at some specific locations). For the M2 major axis velocity amplitude, the MAE across the 95 current meter sites, where the observed amplitude ranges from 0.1 to 156â<span class="inline-formula">cmâs<sup>â1</sup></span>, is 6.9â<span class="inline-formula">cmâs<sup>â1</sup></span>, or 22â% of the 31.7â<span class="inline-formula">cmâs<sup>â1</sup></span> observed mean. This nationwide average result is encouraging, but it conceals a very large regional variation. Relative errors of the tidal current amplitudes on the narrow shelves of New South Wales (NSW) and Western Australia exceed 100â%, but tidal currents are weak and negligible there compared to non-tidal currents, so the tidal errors are of little practical significance. Looking nationwide, we show that the model has predictive value for much of the 79â% of Australia's shelf seas where tides are a major component of the total velocity variability. In descending order this includes the Bass Strait, the Kimberley to Arnhem Land, and southern Great Barrier Reef regions. There is limited observational evidence to confirm that the model is also valuable for currents in other regions across northern Australia. We plan to commence publishing âunofficialâ tidal current predictions for chosen regions in the near future based on both our COMPAS model and the validation dataset we have assembled.
Highlights
Tidal currents are a major component of the velocity variability for most of the Australian continental shelf, yet tidal current predictions are only listed in the Australian National Tide Tables for seven sites, five of which are in Torres Strait
This is a significant number of sites, but it is still small compared to the 683 sites for which the Bureau of Meteorology Tidal Unit has estimates of tidal height harmonic constituents
We have evaluated the tidal heights in our COMPAS model against a large number (615) of sites around Australia, giving a much more detailed picture than was given, for example, by Haigh et al (2014) or Seifi et al (2019), while being broadly consistent
Summary
Tidal currents are a major component of the velocity variability for most of the Australian continental shelf, yet tidal current predictions are only listed in the Australian National Tide Tables for seven sites, five of which are in Torres Strait. As part of a project to map Australia’s tidal energy resource and as a step towards an operational, model-based tidal current forecasting ability, we have compiled a tidal current harmonic constituent validation dataset at 95 sites based on observations acquired by a number of agencies. This is a significant number of sites, but it is still small compared to the 683 sites for which the Bureau of Meteorology Tidal Unit has estimates of tidal height harmonic constituents. Taking non-tidal currents into account as well, we identify the regions of Australia where model-based tidal current predictions are accurate, and a large part of the total variability
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.