Abstract

This paper provides initial results from a multi-model ensemble analysis based on the volc-pinatubo-full experiment performed within the Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to volcanic forcing (VolMIP) as part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The volc-pinatubo-full experiment is based on ensemble of volcanic forcing-only climate simulations with the same volcanic aerosol dataset across the participating models (the 1991–1993 Pinatubo period from the CMIP6-GloSSAC dataset). The simulations are conducted within an idealized experimental design where initial states are sampled consistently across models from the CMIP6-piControl simulation providing unperturbed pre-industrial background conditions. The multi-model ensemble includes output from an initial set of six participating Earth system models (CanESM5, GISS-E2.1-G, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROC-E2SL, MPI-ESM1.2-LR and UKESM1). The results show overall good agreement between the different models on the global and hemispheric scale concerning the surface climate responses, thus demonstrating the overall effectiveness of VolMIP’s experimental design. However, small yet significant inter-model discrepancies are found in radiative fluxes especially in the tropics, that preliminary analyses link with minor differences in forcing implementation, model physics, notably aerosol-radiation interactions, the simulation and sampling of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and, possibly, the simulation of climate feedbacks operating in the tropics. We discuss the volc-pinatubo-full protocol and highlight the advantages of volcanic forcing experiments defined within a carefully designed protocol with respect to emerging modeling approaches based on large ensemble transient simulations. We identify how the VolMIP strategy could be improved in future phases of the initiative to ensure a cleaner sampling protocol with greater focus on the evolving state of ENSO in the pre-eruption period.

Highlights

  • The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP, Zanchettin et al, 2016) defined a 55 coordinated set of idealized volcanic perturbation experiments to be carried out in alignment with the protocol of the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6, Eyring et al, 2016)

  • This paper provides initial results from a multi-model ensemble analysis based on the volc-pinatubo-full experiment performed within the Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to volcanic forcing (VolMIP) as part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)

  • The climate state in piControl is illustrated in the form of BoxWhisker plots of relevant diagnostics calculated for the whole length of the simulations, including global and 295 regional averages of annual-mean near-surface air temperature (Fig. 3a-d), and winter El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) indices as defined by the VolMIP protocol (Fig. 3e,f)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP, Zanchettin et al, 2016) defined a 55 coordinated set of idealized volcanic perturbation experiments to be carried out in alignment with the protocol of the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6, Eyring et al, 2016). Climate conditions defining the initial states of individual members of the ensemble must be selected in a consistent manner across the participating models, so that the diagnosed expected climate response is not biased by potential 65 effects of a preferential phase of ongoing internal variability at the time of the eruption (see, e.g., Zanchettin et al, 2013; Swingedouw et al, 2015; Lehner et al, 2016; Khodri et al, 2017; Coupe and Robock, 2021) This is achieved by defining desired states of climate variability modes to be sampled along the parent CMIP6-DECK piControl simulation representative of unperturbed preindustrial climate conditions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.