Abstract
We present a top-down approach for aerosol emission estimation from SPEXone polarimetric retrievals related to the aerosol amount, size, and absorption using a fixed-lag ensemble Kalman smoother (LETKS) in combination with the ECHAM-HAM model. We assess the system by performing Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs), in order to evaluate the ability of the future multi-angle polarimeter instrument, SPEXone, as well as a satellite with near perfect global coverage. In our OSSEs, the Nature Run (NAT) is a simulation by the global climate aerosol model ECHAM-HAM with altered aerosol emissions. The Control (CTL) and the data assimilation (DAS) experiments are composed of an ensemble of ECHAM-HAM simulations, where the default aerosol emissions are perturbed with factors taken from a Gaussian distribution. Synthetic observations, specifically Aerosol Optical Depth at 550 nm (AOD550), Angstrom Exponent from 550 nm to 865 nm (AE550-865) and Single Scattering Albedo at 550 nm (SSA550) are assimilated in order to estimate the aerosol emission fluxes of desert dust (DU), sea salt (SS), organic carbon (OC), black carbon (BC) and sulphate (SO4), along with the emission fluxes of two SO4 precursor gases (SO2, DMS). The synthetic observations are sampled from the NAT according to two satellite observing systems, with different spatial coverages. The first is the sensor SPEXone, a hyperspectral multi-angle polarimeter with a narrow swath (~100 km), that will be a part of the NASA PACE mission. The second is an idealized sensor that can retrieve observations over the whole globe even under cloudy conditions. The prior emission global relative Mean Absolute Error (MAE) before the assimilation ranges from 33 % to 117 %. Depending on the species, the assimilated observations sampled using the idealized sensor, reduce this error to equal to or lower than 5 %. Despite its limited coverage, the SPEXone sampling bares similar results, with somewhat larger errors for DU and SS (both having a MAE equal to 11 %). Further, experiments show that doubling the measurement error, increases the global relative MAE to 22 % for DU and SS. The emission estimation of the other species is not affected as much by these changes. In addition, the role of biased meteorology on emission estimation was quantified by using two different datasets (ERA-5 and ERA-interim) to nudge the U and V wind components of the model. The results reveal that when the wind of DAS uses a different reanalysis dataset than the NAT the estimated SS emissions are negatively affected the most, while the estimated emissions of DU, OC, BC and SO2 are negatively affected to a smaller extent. If the DAS uses dust or sea salt emission parametrisations that are very different from the NAT, posterior emissions can still be successfully estimated but this experiment revealed that the source location is important for the estimation of dust emissions. This work suggests that the upcoming SPEXone sensor will provide observations related to aerosol amount, size and absorption with sufficient coverage and accuracy, in order to estimate aerosol emissions.
Highlights
Data assimilation methods can greatly improve the aerosol representation in the atmosphere by combining the simulated aerosol state of a model with the observed aerosol optical and microphysical properties retrieved from satellites
520 The data assimilation experiments based on SPEXone or the theoretical sensor provide similar results in terms of the estimated emissions and the simulated observations, which is very encouraging since it shows that SPEXone spatially limited observational coverage will be able to constrain emission almost as good as the theoretical satellite setup
Note that we assume that 1.875 degree aggregate of SPEXone contain non-significant representation error, the observations of both sensors are unbiased and the differences in observations of the nature run and the data assimilation run are only caused by differences in 525 emissions
Summary
Data assimilation methods can greatly improve the aerosol representation in the atmosphere by combining the simulated aerosol state of a model with the observed aerosol optical and microphysical properties retrieved from satellites. Schutgens et al (2021) intercompared and evaluated with AERONET four satellite products (FL-MOC, OMAERUV, POLDER-GRASP and POLDER-SRON) for AAOD and SSA and suggested that satellite absorption observations could be used to evaluate AEROCOM model biases, since the diversity of model biases is larger than satellite biases It has been noted in the past that multi-viewing angle and multi-wavelength intensity and polarization measurements with high accuracy the have largest capability to provide the aerosol properties relevant to climate research (Hasekamp and Landgraf, 2007). Hasekamp et al (2019b) showed that polarimetric satellite retrievals related to aerosol shape, size and number provide a more accurate aerosol indirect radiative effect compared to previous observational-based studies Only one such Multi-Angle Polarimeter (MAP) provided aerosol optical and microphysical properties from space for several years in the past (2004-2013), the Polarization and Directionality of Earth Reflectances (POLDER-3) on board of the microsatellite
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.