Abstract
Accurate corrections for the effects of alpha ejection (the loss of daughter He near grain or crystal surfaces due to long alpha-stopping distances) is central to (U-Th)/He thermochronometry. In the case of apatite (U-Th)/He dating, alpha-ejection correction is complicated by the fact that crystals are often broken perpendicular to the c-axis. In such cases the correction should account for the fact that only some parts of the crystal are affected by alpha-ejection. A common current practice to account for such broken crystals is to modify measured lengths of broken crystals missing one termination by a factor of 1.5, and those missing both terminations by a factor of 2. This alpha-ejection “correction correction” systematically overestimates the actual fraction of helium lost to alpha ejection, and thus overcorrects the measured date relative to that determined for an otherwise equivalent unbroken crystal. The alpha-ejection-affected surface-area-to-volume ratio of a fragmented crystal is equivalent to the surface-area-to-volume ratio of an unbroken crystal twice as long (for fragments with one termination), and equivalent to that of an unbroken crystal infinitely long (for fragments with no termination). We suggest it is appropriate to revise the fragmentation correction to multiply the length of crystals missing one c-axis termination by 2, and those missing both c-axis termination by some large number >~20, respectively. We examine the effect of this revised correction and demonstrate the accuracy of the new method using synthetic datasets. Taking into account alpha-ejection, rounding of the He concentration profile due to diffusive loss, and accumulation of radiation damage over a range of thermal histories, we show that the revised fragmentation alpha-ejection correction proposed here accurately approximates the corrected date of an unbroken crystal (“true” date) to within < 0.7 % on average (±4.2 %, 1σ), whereas the former method overcorrects dates to be ~3 % older than the “true” date, on average. For individual grains, the former method can result in older dates by a few percent in most cases, and by as much as 12 % for grains with aspect ratio of up to 1 : 1. The revised alpha-ejection correction proposed here is both more accurate and more precise than the previous correction, and does not introduce any significant systematic bias to the apparent dates from a sample.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.