Comment on “Formation of chenier plain of the Doñana marshland (SW Spain): Observations and geomorphic model” by A. Rodríguez-Ramírez and C.M. Yáñez-Camacho [Marine Geology 254 (2008) 187–196

Abstract

The application of the regional marine 14C reservoir effect (Δ R) to obtain an accurate calibration of conventional marine shell 14C dates requires prior research concerning the oceanographic conditions and the Δ R of that region. Rodríguez-Ramírez and Yánez-Camacho [A. Rodríguez-Ramírez, C.M. Yánez-Camacho, Formation of chenier plain of the Doñana marshland (SW Spain): Observations and geomorphic model, Marine Geology 254 (2008) 187–196] and afterwards A. Rodríguez-Ramírez, J.A. Morales, J. Borrego and E.G. San Miguel in a reply [A. Rodríguez-Ramírez, J.A. Morales, J. Borrego, E.G. San Miguel, Reply to the comment on “Formation of chenier plain of the Doñana marshland (SW Spain): Observations and geomorphic model” by A. Rodríguez-Ramírez and C.M. Yáñez-Camacho [Marine Geology 254 (2008) 187–196], Marine Geology 263 (2009) 123–125] to the comment by J. Rodríguez-Vidal, F. Ruiz and L.M. Cáceres on the paper mentioned above [J. Rodríguez-Vidal, F. Ruiz, L. M. Cáceres, Comment on “Formation of chenier plain of the Doñana marshland (SW Spain): Observations and geomorphic model” by A. Rodríguez-Ramírez, C.M. Yáñez-Camacho [Marine Geology 254 (2008) 187–196], Marine Geology 263 (2009) 120–122] use, in both cases, not only incorrect Δ R values for the calibration of 14C dates obtained from shell samples collected from the east coast of the Gulf of Cádiz, but they also confuse the Δ R concept with that of R( t), the 14C reservoir age. Because the misunderstanding of these concepts by these authors and, in the first case, also their failure to take into account the Δ R values obtained by us (and already published) from the east coast of Gulf of Cádiz, all the calibrated dates presented either in the first paper or in the reply cannot be accepted. Here I present a new calibrated dataset using accurate Δ R values and I recommend that the conclusions obtained by Rodríguez-Ramírez and their collaborators be revised, as J. Rodríguez-Vidal, F. Ruiz and L.M. Cáceres proposed in their comment.