Comment on “Error made in reports of main field decay”

Abstract

As the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) Working Group on Geomagnetic Field Modeling (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/), responsible for the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) [Macmillan et al., 2003], we would like to comment on the Forum article by Wallace H.Campbell (Eos,85(16),20 April 2004). Campbell claims that reports of dipole decay at a special session held at the AGU 2003 Fall Meeting were misleading due to an incorrect choice of the coordinate system for the spherical harmonic analysis (SHA) of the geomagnetic field used for the IGRF the model on which the decay calculation was based.Campbell alleges that the dipole moment of a spherical harmonic expansion depends on the choice of the origin of the coordinate system. In his textbook on geomagnetism, Campbell goes one step further in asserting that, without changing the origin, the process of “tilting the analysis axis to align with the geomagnetic axis…would enhance the dipole term at the expense of the higher multipoles” [Campbell, 2003].