Abstract
<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Machine learning (ML) models are becoming a meaningful tool for modeling air pollutant concentrations. ML models are capable of learning and modeling complex non-linear interactions between variables, and they require less computational effort than chemical transport models (CTMs). In this study, we used gradient boosted tree (GBT) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP; neural network) algorithms to model near-surface nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) concentrations over Germany at 0.1 degree spatial resolution and daily intervals. We trained the ML models using TROPOMI satellite column measurements combined with information on emission sources, air pollutant precursors and meteorology as feature variables. We found that the trained GBT model for NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> explained a major portion of the observed concentrations (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68–0.88, RMSE = 4.77–8.67 <em>μ</em>g m<sup>-3</sup> and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.74–0.92, RMSE = 8.53–13.2 <em>μ</em>g m<sup>-3</sup>, respectively). The trained MLP model performed worse than the trained GBT model for both NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.46–0.82 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.42–0.9, respectively). Our NO<sub>2</sub> GBT model outperforms the CAMS model, a data-assimilated CTM, but slightly under-performs for O<sub>3</sub>. However, our NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> ML models require less computational effort than CTM. Therefore, we can analyze people’s exposure to near-surface NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> with significantly less effort. During the study period (2018-04-30 and 2021-07-01), it was found that around 36 % of people lived in locations where the WHO NO<sub>2</sub> limit was exceeded for more than 25 % of the days, while 90 % of the population resided in areas where the WHO O<sub>3</sub> limit was surpassed for over 25 % of days. Although metropolitan areas had high NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, rural areas, particularly in southern Germany, had high O<sub>3</sub> concentrations. Furthermore, our ML models can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation policies. Near-surface NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations changes during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown period over Germany were indeed reproduced by the GBT model, with meteorology-accounted for near-surface NO<sub>2</sub> significantly decreased (by 23±5.3 %) and meteorology-accounted for near-surface O<sub>3</sub> slightly increased (by 1±4.6 %) over ten major German metropolitan areas, compared to 2019. Finally, our O<sub>3</sub> GBT model is highly transferable to other countries, at least to neighboring countries and locations where no measurements are available (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.87–0.94), whereas our NO<sub>2</sub> GBT model is moderately transferable (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.32–0.64).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.