Comment on: "ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy", looking to the future.

Abstract

Magallon-Pedrera I, Perez-Altozano J, Virizuela Echaburu JA, Beato-Zambrano C, Borrega-Garcia P, de la Torre-Montero JC. ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy. Clin Transl Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02347-1. Article PubMed Google Scholar DAV Expert [Mobile application software]. (V.1.0.0). Milan, Italy: GAVeCeLT. (2018). Retrieved (May 23, 2020) from: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=it.gavecalt.davexph98(11):427–33. https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2019.98.11.427-433. CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar Marcy PY, Magne N, Castadot P, et al. Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients?: analysis of a large bi-institutional experience. Cancer. 2007;110(10):2331–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23040. Article PubMed Google Scholar Liu Y, Li LL, Xu L, Feng DD, Cao Y, Mao XY, Zheng J, Jin F, Chen B. Comparison between arm port and chest port for optimal vascular access port in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9082924. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Taxbro K, Hammarskjold F, Thelin B, et al. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(6):734–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038. Article PubMed Google Scholar Dawson R. PICC zone insertion method™ (ZIM™): a systematic approach to determine the ideal insertion site for PICCs in the upper arm. J Vasc Access. 2011;16:156–65. https://doi.org/10.2309/java.16-3-5. Article Google Scholar Santacruz E, Mateo-Lobo R, Vega-Pinero B, et al. Colocacion de cateteres centrales de insercion periferica (PICC) mediante control electrocardiografico intracavitario (ECG-IC) de la punta del cateter [Intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement]. Nutr Hosp. 2018;35(5):1005–8. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.1847. Article PubMed Google Scholar Bertoglio S, Cafiero F, Meszaros P, et al. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Vasc Access. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729819884482. Article PubMed Google Scholar Merlicco D, Lombardi M, Fino MC. PICC-PORT: valid indication to placement in patient with results of extensive skin burns of the neck and chest in oncology. The first case in the scientific literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;68:63–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.02.028. CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Spencer TR, Mahoney KJ. Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017;44:427–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1569-y. Article PubMed Google Scholar Schears GJ, Ferko N, Syed I, Arpino JM, Alsbrooks K. Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted with current best practices have low deep vein thrombosis and central line-associated bloodstream infection risk compared with centrally inserted central catheters: a contemporary meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820916113. Article PubMed Google Scholar Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G. The GAVeCeLT manual of PICC and midline. Indications, insertion, management. Milan: Edra Edizioni; 2017. Google Scholar Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle M, McGoldrick M, Orr M, Doellman D. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs. 2016;39(Suppl):S1–S159. Google Scholar Liu Y, Gao Y, Wei L, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis incidence and risk factors in cancer patients: a double-center prospective investigation. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:153–60. PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Pu YL, Li ZS, Zhi XX, et al. Complications and costs of peripherally inserted central venous catheters compared with implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000742. Article PubMed Google Scholar Moureau N, Lamperti M, Kelly LJ, et al. Evidence-based consensus on the insertion of central venous access devices: definition of minimal requirements for training. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(3):347–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes499. CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar Download references Authors thank Prof. Pittiruti and Prof. De la Torre Montero for their suggestions during the preparation of this text. Authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain G. Ortiz Miluy Hospital Universitario Dr. Jesus Gilberto Gomez Maza, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Mexico E. Nataren Cigarroa Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain M. A. Cubero Perez You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Correspondence to G. Ortiz Miluy. Authors have no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. For this type of study formal consent is not required. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Italian Group for Long Term Vascular Access (GAveCeLT): Gloria Ortiz Miluy. World Conference in Vascular Access (WoCoVA): Gloria...