Abstract
In a recent publication Schatz [Astropart. Phys. (2003), this issue] argues that unambiguous results about energy distributions of primary cosmic-ray mass groups can only be obtained from measured air shower observables if their mutual correlations are explicitly taken into account. This statement is used to challenge preliminary results presented by the KASCADE Collaboration at the International Cosmic Ray Conference in Hamburg, 2001 [KASCADE Collaboration, 27th ICRC, Hamburg, 2001, p. 97; KASCADE Collaboration, Invited Rapporteur and Highlight Papers of ICRC 2001, p. 240]. In this comment it is argued that the criticism of Schatz does not apply to the aforementioned analysis of KASCADE data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
