Comment on “Characteristics and trends in various forms of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) during 1900–2008” by Aiguo Dai

Abstract

] Dai [2011] (henceforth D11) reported that the PalmerDrought Severity Index (PDSI) is superior to other statisti-cally based drought indices including the StandardizedPrecipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized PrecipitationEvapotranspiration Index (SPEI). D11 argued that given thephysical character of the PDSI water balance model, theindex provides robust estimates of drought severity becauseit takes the preceding conditions into account, in contrast toother drought indices that are based purely on past statisticsof particular climate variable(s). However, D11 has over-estimated the ability of the PDSI to realistically simulate thedistributed soil water balance at large spatial scales, andignored the inherent complexity and multiscalar character ofdrought phenomena, which are related to more than themoisture conditions of the soil. In this comment we discussthe complex characteristics of droughts and the limitationsof the PDSI to quantify drought conditions in a variety ofhydrological systems. We describe the advantages of statis-tically based drought indices including the SPI and the SPEI.ThefactthattheSPIandtheSPEIarenot(anddonotintendtobe) physically based indices is more liberating than con-straining, especially when the physical basis of PDSI can beseriously questioned.[