Abstract

Throughout the course of their lives fish ingest food containing essential elements, including nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and iron (Fe). Some of these elements are retained in the fish body to build new biomass, which acts as a stored reservoir of nutrients, while the rest is excreted or egested, providing a recycling flux to water. Fishing activity has modified the fish biomass distribution worldwide and consequently may have altered fish-mediated nutrient cycling, but this possibility remains largely unassessed, mainly due to the difficulty of estimating global fish biomass and metabolic rates. Here we quantify the role of commercially-targeted marine fish between 10 g and 100 kg () in the cycling of N, P and Fe in the global ocean, and its change due to fishing activity, by using a global size-spectrum model of marine fish populations calibrated to observations of fish catches. Our results show that the amount of nutrients stored in the global pristine , biomass was generally small compared to the ambient surface nutrient concentrations but significant in the nutrient-poor regions of the world: the North Atlantic for P, the oligotrophic gyres for N and the High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll (HNLC) regions for Fe. Similarly, the rate of nutrient removed from the ocean through fishing is globally small compared to the inputs, but can be important locally especially for Fe in the equatorial Pacific and along the western margin of South America and Africa. This model allowed us to compute the spatial distribution of the cycling of elements by the biomass at pristine and global peak catch state, which is relatively small compared to the estimated primary production demand for nutrients and estimated export production of nutrients. Pristine cycling (excretion + egestion) accounted for less than 2.7 % of the primary productivity demand for N, P and Fe globally. Relative to the export of nutrients, modeled global pristine egestion represents on average 2.3 %, 3.0 % and 1.1–22 % for N, P and Fe (low-high estimates), respectively, with a higher fraction in the low-export oligotrophic tropical gyres. Our study highlights the role of the fraction of the icthyosphere (i.e. does not include non-commercial species such as mesopelagic fish) on nutrient storage and cycling, and the potential role of fishing activities on this cycling, which could be of importance in regions of low nutrient concentration, high fish biomass and/or high productivity demand, and especially at the more local scale for Fe.

Highlights

  • We quantify the role of commercially-targeted marine fish between 10g and 100kg (CT F1100g0kg) in the cycling of N, P and Fe in the global ocean, and its change due to fishing activity, by using a global size-spectrum model of marine fish populations calibrated to observations of fish catches

  • Our results show that the amount of nutrients stored in the global pristine CT F1100g0kg biomass was generally small compared to the ambient surface nutrient concentrations but significant in the nutrient-poor regions of the 10 world: the North Atlantic for P, the oligotrophic gyres for N and the High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll (HNLC) regions for Fe

  • Our study highlights the role of the CT F1100g0kg fraction of the icthyosphere on nutrient storage and cycling, and the potential role of fishing activities on 20 this cycling, which could be of importance in regions of low nutrient concentration, high fish biomass and/or high productivity demand, and especially at the more local scale for Fe

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plankton and bacteria dominate the cycling of nutrients in the ocean (Sarmiento and Gruber, 2006) but an increasing number 25 of studies recognize the contribution of animals to biogeochemical cycles (e.g., Saba et al, 2021). Far there has been little effort to estimate how the global fish population, which we term "ichtyosphere", influences large-scale nutrient cycling. During their lifecycle, fish assimilate, store and recycle essential elements that they need to build their body tissues. Fish assimilate, store and recycle essential elements that they need to build their body tissues This 35 storage of nutrients within fish biomass is important for human nutrition as wild-caught fish globally provide essential proteins and other micronutrients (Hicks et al, 2019). We investigate the amount and spatial distribution of nutrients stored and cycled by the CTF biomass betwen 10g and 100kg, CT F1100g0kg, in a pristine state and at the global peak catch, as well as the flux of nutrients removed by fisheries at the time of the global peak catch (Fig. 1)

Methods
Nutrient content of fish
Nutrient cycling by fish
Primary producers demand, nutrient concentrations and export and atmospheric deposition
Fish biomass: a living pool of nutrients
Nutrient content variations in fish and limitations of our study
Nutrient cycling by the commercial fish biomass
Nutrient cycling by commercial fish and primary producers demand
Extended size-spectrum and total fish biomass
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Local and time-dependent nutrient budgets
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call