Abstract
AbstractLiang et al. () presented an analysis of the impacts of unsaturated zone processes on streamflow recession using methodology from Brutsaert and Nieber () with a constant time step in computation of the time derivative of flow. Over the past 10 years, many authors have demonstrated that this method may produce artifacts that lead to incorrect interpretations. To demonstrate the impact of the choice of analysis methods, this comment presents an estimation of recession parameters using the Liang et al. () discharge data that eliminates artifacts introduced through the constant time step. Here we use the exponential time step method, which revealed recession coefficient b greater than 1 which is inconsistent with the fitting framework used in Liang et al. ().
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.