Comment on “Anomalous structural recovery in the near glass transition range in a polymer glass: Data revisited in light of temperature variability in vacuum oven‐based experiments”

Abstract

AbstractRecent efforts, fostered by a pioneering work by us, have shown the of multiple steps in the recovery of equilibrium of glasses. Jin and McKenna raise concerns regarding the validity of such scenario alleging that the multiple recovery steps would be an artifact arising from poor temperature control in the oven used for isothermal glass equilibration. We critically discuss Jin and McKenna arguments from both the viewpoints of scrutinizing previous literature data and that of the temperature control in the oven. In doing so, we provide compelling arguments that Jin and McKenna conjectures are unjustified and point out the need for efforts to describe glass dynamics significantly below the glass transition temperature, Tg, by accounting for the presence of different relaxation mechanisms active in glass equilibration.