Abstract
The "erratum and addendum" by Anderson and Ones (this issue) does not state unambiguously that participants' HPI scale scores were incorrectly matched with their scores on the other inventories' scales, nor does it mention the existence of other errors in the scoring of the OPQ and BPI scales. We demonstrate these errors, and we recommend the retraction of the articles by Anderson and Ones (2003) and Ones and Anderson (2002).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
