Abstract
In their recent paper [Phys. Rev. E 79, 031115 (2009)], Ning Jia and Shoufeng Ma used some Markov chain arguments for the analytical description of inflow in the deterministic Nagel-Schreckenberg model with open boundaries. In this context, they considered two different mechanisms of injecting vehicles: the standard injection rule and a popular expanded injection rule. While the results for the first one seem to be correct, simulations show that the inflow formula in case of the expanded injection rule yields only approximate results. Therefore, this comment provides the exact formula also in this case and explains the shortcoming in the derivation of Jia and Ma.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
