Abstract

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Atmospheric carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) is the most significant greenhouse gas, and its concentration is continuously increasing, mainly as a consequence of anthropogenic activities. Accurate quantification of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> is critical for addressing the global challenge of climate change and for designing mitigation strategies aimed at stabilizing <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions. Satellites provide the most effective way to monitor the concentration of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> in the atmosphere. In this study, we utilized the concentration of the column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>, i.e., <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span> retrieved from a <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> monitoring satellite, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), and the net primary productivity (NPP) provided by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to estimate the anthropogenic <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions using the Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) over East and West Asia. OCO-2 <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span>, MODIS NPP, and the Open-Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (ODIAC) <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emission datasets for a period of 5 years (2015–2019) were used in this study. The annual <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span> anomalies were calculated from the OCO-2 retrievals for each year to remove the larger background <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> concentrations and seasonal variability. The <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span> anomaly, NPP, and ODIAC emission datasets from 2015 to 2018 were then used to train the GRNN model, and, finally, the anthropogenic <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions were estimated for 2019 based on the NPP and <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span> anomalies derived for the same year. The estimated and the ODIAC <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions were compared, and the results showed good agreement in terms of spatial distribution. The <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions were estimated separately over East and West Asia. In addition, correlations between the ODIAC emissions and <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span> anomalies were also determined separately for East and West Asia, and East Asia exhibited relatively better results. The results showed that satellite-based <span class="inline-formula">XCO<sub>2</sub></span> retrievals can be used to estimate the regional-scale anthropogenic <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions, and the accuracy of the results can be enhanced by further improvement of the GRNN model with the addition of more <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emission and concentration datasets.

Highlights

  • Climate change is one of the greatest challenges to the future of Earth, and it stems from global warming, which is accelerated by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (Lamminpää et al, 2019)

  • The study was carried out using Open-Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (ODIAC) CO2 emissions, Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) XCO2, and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) net primary productivity (NPP) datasets from 2015 to 2019

  • A Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) model was built; XCO2 anomalies, NPP, and CO2 emissions from 2015 to 2018 were used as a training dataset; and, CO2 emissions were predicted for 2019 based on the NPP and XCO2 anomalies calculated for the same year

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change is one of the greatest challenges to the future of Earth, and it stems from global warming, which is accelerated by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (Lamminpää et al, 2019). It is known that such information can be subject to errors and biases, leading to considerable discrepancies and uncertainties in emission estimates, especially in the case of rapidly growing developing economies such as China and India (Guan et al, 2012; Korsbakken et al, 2016). These discrepancies can result in ∼40 % to ∼100 % uncertainty in emission estimations at the country and the local scales, respectively (Peylin et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013). It is becoming increasingly important to find efficient and reliable ways of monitoring CO2 reduction progress and to evaluate how well specific CO2 reduction policies are working

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call