Abstract
A proof of the $Z=0$ condition for compositeness is examined. In a previous criticism of this proof a paradoxical result was pointed out. It is proved that this result can be understood by precisely explaining the meaning of the equality of the elementary field and the Haag-Nishijima-Zimmermann field for the composite bound state.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
