Abstract
The Gilman-Schnitzer evaluation of the Cabibbo-Radicati sum rule is discussed. It is argued that the SU(2) generalization of the ΔN πγ contact5 term has to be included in the evaluation. Doing so considerably decreases (15% rather than 8% discrepancy) the agreement of the sum rule with the data.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
