Abstract

This article analyses the judicial path, crossed by lights and shadows, and its ability to make it feasible to more easily learn information about one’s own parental history in anonymous birth. A comparison is made between the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law and the Italian Constitutional Court case law, showing differences in the methods but strong similarities in the substantive solutions. Conclusively, in the Italian legal system, the mother’s decision to confirm her original choice for anonymity has an undisputed prevalence when it tries to balance with the child’s constitutional right to have his or her own personal experience recognised.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call