Abstract
Background: This paper presents findings from a study which sought to understand why health workers working under the results-based financing (RBF) arrangements in Zimbabwe reported being satisfied with the improvements in working conditions and compensation, but paradoxically reported lower motivation levels compared to those not working under RBF arrangements. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted amongst health workers and managers working in health facilities that were implementing the RBF arrangements and those that were not. Through purposeful sampling, 4 facilities in RBF implementing districts that reported poor motivation and satisfaction, were included as study sites. Four facilities located in non-RBF districts which reported high motivation and satisfaction were also included. Data was collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using the framework approach. Results: Results based financing arrangements introduce a wide range of new institutional arrangements, roles, tasks, and ways of doing things, for facility staff, facility managers and, district and provincial health management teams. Findings reveal that insufficient preparedness of people and processes for this change, constrained managers and workers performance. Results based financing arrangements introduce explicit and tacit changes, including but not limited to, incentive logics, in the system. Findings show that unless systematic efforts are made to enable the absorption of these changes in the system: eg, through reconfiguring the decision space available at various levels, through clarification of accountability relationships, through building personnel and process capacities, before instituting changes, the full potential of the RBF arrangements cannot be realised. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the importance of analysing existing institutional, management and governance arrangements and capabilities and taking these into account when designing and implementing RBF interventions. Introducing RBF arrangements cannot alone overcome chronic systemic weaknesses. For a system wide change, as RBF arguably is, to be effected, explicit organisational change management processes need to be put in place, across the system. Carefully designed processes, which take into account the interest and willingness of various actors to change, and which are cognizant of and constructively engage with potential bottlenecks and points of resistance, should accompany any health system change initiative.
Highlights
Several low- and middle-income countries are turning to results-based financing (RBF) arrangements as a means to achieve their universal health coverage related ambitions
While in the Health Results Innovations Trust Fund (HRITF) framework, geography is subsumed in the community context – our findings reveal that geographical considerations shape health workers experience in multiple ways, linking across community, health systems, and health facility contexts
This study clearly shows the importance of recognising RBF as a policy intervention being introduced in a complex environment with pre-existing dynamics
Summary
Several low- and middle-income countries are turning to results-based financing (RBF) arrangements as a means to achieve their universal health coverage related ambitions. The literature reveals a vibrant debate between proponents and doubters of the RBF approach. This debate is not restricted to academia, but has wide participation of policy-makers, practitioners, and researchers. The questions under debate are wide ranging; for example: some scholars are unpacking the origins and political economy leanings of RBF,[1] some are critically examining the key assumptions underpinning RBF,[2] and others are examining operational and implementation challenges to inform policy and to improve practice.[3,4,5,6]. This study adds to this growing body of empirical examination of the key assumptions underpinning RBF; it does so in light of the operational and implementation ground realities. The insights gained from this study will be useful beyond the study
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.