Abstract

What follows is a method applicable generically to the analysis of low levels of organic matter that is embedded in either loose fine-grained or solid geological material. Initially, the range of organic compounds that could be detected in a geological sample using conventional pyrolysis chromatography/mass spectrometry was compared to the range that was detected using thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (THM-GC/MS). This method was used to validate the synthetic components fitted to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) carbon spectra of the sample. Reciprocally, XPS analysis was able to identify the constituent carbon-carbon, carbon-oxygen and carbon-nitrogen bonds of the functional groups in the compounds identified by THM-GC/MS. The two independently derived outputs from the THM-GC/MS and the XPS techniques mutually validated the identification of organic compounds in our geological samples.We describe in detail the improvements to:•The preparation of geological samples for analysis by XPS.•Measurements of organic material in geological samples using GC/MS.•The use of THM-GC/MS and XPS data used together to characterise low levels of organic material in geological samples.

Highlights

  • This analysis was conducted using a combination of thermal hydrolysis and methylation (THM) coupled gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

  • The number and positions of the synthetic components were informed by the data that was obtained from the THM-GC/MS analysis

  • These compounds are susceptible to thermal decomposition [15], and fewer (7.8%) of these compounds were detected in the THM-GC/MS conducted at 610 C and were absent in the THM-GC/ MS conducted at 1000 C

Read more

Summary

Method Article

Graham Purvisa,*, Naoko Sanob, Cees van der Landa, Anders Barlowc, Elisa Lopez-Capela, Peter Cumpsond, James Hoode, Jake Sheriffe, Neil Graya a Earth, Ocean & Planetary Science Research, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK b Ionoptika Ltd., Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK c Materials Characterisation and Fabrication Platform (MCFP), Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia d Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia e National ESCA and XPS Users’ Service (NEXUS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Background
Method assessment and validation
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call