Abstract

Theories of chaos and complexity are brought into comparison with the social dreaming process and Deleuzian theory. Prigogine’s dissipative structures can be seen as Deleuzian movement, and the affect and meanings of clusters of dreams in social dreaming can also be understood as retaining sense in movement as afforded to them by the social dreaming technique of not foreclosing meaning through interpretation. Complexity teaches that everything is interconnected and specific in difference in complexity, just as dreams and associations in social dreaming are interconnected while retaining individual features. Therefore, this approach to social dreaming gives rise to the possibility that dream sharing in this way can be viewed as an experienced ecology, which opens out a discussion of Guattari’s interest in ecology as compared to Naess.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.