Abstract

The article confronts Bergson’s Time and Free Will with ontological models of temporal reality from analytic time metaphysics, such as presentism, eternalism etc. I maintain that tense (and hence a changing “now”) and temporal extension are crucial features for understanding successive structure within our temporal experience. In the context of analytic metaphysics following McTaggart, however, tense and extension fall under the suspicion that they are not consistent with each other. I show Bergson’s concept of “Qualitative Multiplicity” to open a new perspective on the issue: being introduced as a qualitative and hence not countable or measurable feature, it enables an understanding of temporal extension that differs radically from spatial extension. Following this, we can understand Bergson’s durational realm of the conscious I as temporally extended in qualitative but not numerical respect — which, in turn, is unproblematically consistent with tense. A second issue of the article is a critical reflection on the conception of the external world established in Time and Free Will: I maintain that it is not problem-free to conceive any part of reality as merely tensed and not at all temporally extended. I conclude this to be a strong motivation for expanding further the idea of “Qualitative Multiplicity.”

Highlights

  • There is an astonishing gap between our natural temporal experience and a theoretic analysing of temporal phenomena.1 By “theoretic analysing” I mean both the analysis and the conceptual account of temporal experience itself and giving an objective description of time in metaphysical respects

  • I take this to be a promising perspective for establishing a metaphysical account of time that fits with our natural temporal awareness by bringing together tense and temporal extension

  • We find that combining the aspects of tense and extension poses a certain challenge within the field of theoretical analysis of temporal experience and even tends to be an unattainable goal within the field of temporal metaphysics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is an astonishing gap between our natural temporal experience and a theoretic analysing of temporal phenomena. By “theoretic analysing” I mean both the analysis and the conceptual account of temporal experience itself and giving an objective description of time in metaphysical respects. There is an astonishing gap between our natural temporal experience and a theoretic analysing of temporal phenomena.. The starting point of this paper is that one crucial difficulty for both fields is to combine — on the theoretical level — two aspects of temporal experience, namely, tense and temporal extension. I will specify these notions and explain why I take them to be naturally given together in our intuitive temporal experience. The third section shows that in theoretical reflection, those aspects often appear to be opposing each other. This is significantly mirrored by contemporary metaphysics and, in particular, by the positions

More than one philosopher has come across this gap
Experiencing Succession
Qualitative Multiplicity
Qualitative Multiplicity and Metaphysics?
The Lack of Continuity
12. This may be confusing at first sight
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call