Abstract

A previous article investigated Ricoeur’s stance on myth and demythologising. The intersection of Ricoeur and Bultmann’s work in this field was noted and a future comparison was envisaged with a view to a possible merger. This study is a follow-up and proposes a way in which Ricoeur and Bultmann’s views on myth and demythologisation can be merged in order to gain a broader approach to the understanding of myth and the concept of demythologising. As Ricoeur’s understanding of myth was influenced by literary criticism, Bultmann’s definition of myth is viewed through the lens of literary criticism, before turning to a comparison with Ricoeur’s views. A comparison of their ideas on demythologisation follows. Sociology of knowledge forms the last lens through which a possible merger of their approaches is contemplated.Keywords: myth; demythologisation; Ricoeur; Bultmann; simbolic universe

Highlights

  • Description: Dr Gert Malan is participating in the research project, ‘Socio-Cultural Readings’, directed by Prof

  • The intersection of Ricoeur and Bultmann’s work in this field was noted and a future comparison was envisaged with a view to a possible merger

  • Sociology of knowledge forms the last lens through which a possible merger of their approaches is contemplated

Read more

Summary

Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising

Affiliation: 1Department of New Testament Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. Dr Ernest van Eck, Department of New Testament Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria. How to cite this article: Malan, G., 2016, ‘Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising’, HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 72(3), a3216. The intersection of Ricoeur and Bultmann’s work in this field was noted and a future comparison was envisaged with a view to a possible merger. This study is a follow-up and proposes a way in which Ricoeur and Bultmann’s views on myth and demythologisation can be merged in order to gain a broader approach to the understanding of myth and the concept of demythologising. Sociology of knowledge forms the last lens through which a possible merger of their approaches is contemplated

Defining myth
Open Access
The functions of myth
Conclusions regarding definitions and functions of myth
Myth as symbol and metaphor
Myths fit into a mythical frame of reference as worldview
Translating or eliminating?
Demythologisation as existential interpretation
Demythologisation as deconstruction
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call