Abstract

In African drylands, perennial grasses preferred by grazing livestock are disappearing at an alarming rate. This has led to recurrent livestock feed shortages threatening pastoralist’s livelihoods. Combining native grass reseeding and rainwater harvesting offers a viable and innovative solution to reverse this trend. However, studies to determine how biomass yields are affected by soil moisture availability attributed to in situ rainwater harvesting in African drylands are limited. We investigated how biomass yields of three grasses native to Africa, i.e., Enteropogon macrostachyus (Bush rye grass), Cenchrus ciliaris (African foxtail grass), and Eragrostis superba (Maasai love grass), are affected by soil moisture content in a typical semi-arid landscape. Rainwater harvesting structures included trenches, micro-catchments and furrows. Additionally, rain runoff was diverted from an adjacent road used as a catchment area. Soil moisture was measured between November 2018 and August 2019 using PlantCare Mini-Logger sensors installed at 40 and 50 cm depths and 0, 1, 5 and 15 m away from the trench. Quadrat method was used to determine biomass yields in August 2019. Peaks in soil moisture were observed after rainfall events. Soil moisture content gradually decreased after the rainy season, but was higher closer to the trench. This is attributed to the prolonged rainwater retention in the trenches. Biomass yields were in the order Eragrostis superba > Cenchrus ciliaris > Enteropogon macrostachyus. Biomass production was higher near the trenches for all the studied species. Sensitivity to soil moisture demonstrated by the magnitude to yield reduction during the growing season was in the order Eragrostis superba > Cenchrus ciliaris > Enteropogon macrostachyus. These results suggest that Eragrostis superba is more sensitive to drought stress than Enteropogon macrostachyus that is adapted to a wide range of soil moisture conditions. We demonstrated that in situ rainwater harvesting structures enhanced soil moisture availability and displayed great potential for revegetating denuded natural rangelands in semi-arid African landscapes. Thus, combining rainwater harvesting and reseeding techniques can produce measurable improvements in pastoral livelihoods and should be incorporated in dryland development policies in the region. Ultimately, incorporating such innovative strategies can strengthen the effectiveness of ecological restoration in African drylands to meet the objectives of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.Graphical abstract

Highlights

  • Global drylands account for ~ 41% of the earth’s surface and are host to approximately 2 billion people whose livelihoods mainly depend on the services provided by these ecosystems (Berdugo et al 2021)

  • Our results demonstrate that E. superba was more successful in terms of providing ecosystem services than C. ciliaris and E. macrostachyus

  • Roads provide an additional catchment from which an alternative source of water is harvested. This leads to peaks in the water collection inside the trenches and adds to the in situ rainwater harvesting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global drylands account for ~ 41% of the earth’s surface and are host to approximately 2 billion people whose livelihoods mainly depend on the services provided by these ecosystems (Berdugo et al 2021). Interannual rainfall in these environments can vary from 50 to 100% in arid lands and 20 to 30% in the semi-arid lands (Mumo et al 2019) This erratic nature and low rainfall regimes and recurrent droughts have partly contributed to the gradual depletion of native perennial forage resources for livestock in these drylands. Current and projected climate trends across most of African drylands show increasing drought frequency and rainfall variability (Sheffield and Wood 2008). This worsens vegetation degradation and escalates environmental sensitivity to drought, leading to ecological and social vulnerability among pastoralists (Bardgett et al 2021; King et al 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call