Combining Phase Advancement and Period Correction Explains Rushing during Joint Rhythmic Activities

Thomas Wolf,Peter E. Keller,Natalie Sebanz,Günther Knoblich,Cordula Vesper

doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45601-5

Thomas Wolf, Peter E. Keller + Show 3 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45601-5

Copy DOI

Abstract

When people engage in rhythmic joint actions, from simple clapping games to elaborate joint music making, they tend to increase their tempo unconsciously. Despite the rich literature on rhythmic performance in humans, the mechanisms underlying joint rushing are still unknown. We propose that joint rushing arises from the concurrent activity of two separate mechanisms. The phase advance mechanism was first proposed in research on synchronously flashing fireflies and chorusing insects. When this mechanism is combined with a human-specific period correction mechanism, the shortened periods of individual intervals are translated into a tempo increase. In three experiments, we investigated whether joint rushing can be reliably observed in a joint synchronization-continuation drumming task. Furthermore, we asked whether perceptual similarities produced by the actions of different individuals modulate the joint rushing effect. The results showed that joint rushing is a robust phenomenon occurring in groups of different sizes. Joint rushing was more pronounced when the action effects produced by different individuals were perceptually similar, supporting the assumption that a phase advance mechanism contributed to rushing. Further control conditions ruled out the alternative hypothesis that rushing during rhythmic interactions can be explained by social facilitation or action mirroring effects.

Highlights

We argue that if joint rushing emerges from human interaction in contrast to purely individual processes, predominant models of inter-subjective sensorimotor synchronization are incomplete
That current models of interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization in humans do not account for tempo drift and can not explain why groups engaging in rhythmic joint activities tend to increase tempo over time
We propose that joint rushing arises from the concurrent activity of two separate mechanisms: (1) The phase advance mechanism, a mechanism that shortens single intervals and thereby brings about synchrony, and (2) a human-specific adaptive period correction mechanism that translates the shortened period of individual intervals into a tempo change by adjusting internal timekeepers

Summary

Introduction

We argue that if joint rushing emerges from human interaction in contrast to purely individual processes, predominant models of inter-subjective sensorimotor synchronization are incomplete. That current models of interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization in humans do not account for tempo drift and can not explain why groups engaging in rhythmic joint activities tend to increase tempo over time Two indications that this is a robust phenomenon come from recent studies[6,7]. Empirical data from these experiments is best explained by assuming a selective phase advance mechanism that favors signals with similar acoustic properties Even though this mechanism is biased towards shortening periods, the single, shortened periods it produces cannot account for a continuous tempo increase

Objectives

Methods

Findings

Conclusion