Abstract
The Marsh Fritillary butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia) is a Eurasian species which has suffered significant reductions in occurrence and abundance over the past century, particularly across the western side of its range, due to agricultural intensification and habitat loss. This loss has been particularly severe in the UK with extensive localised extinctions. Following sympathetic management, reintroduction was undertaken at four Cumbria (northern UK) sites in 2007 with stock from a captive admixture population descended from Cumbrian and Scottish founders. Annual population monitoring of the reintroductions was undertaken. Nine years post-reintroduction, the level of population genetic variation was assessed using microsatellites. Variation in historical Cumbrian samples was determined using museum samples and Scottish samples from current populations were assayed to characterise natural population variation. Half of the Scottish sites also served as indicators of the alleles present in the founder populations. The genetic contribution of the founder populations allied to population size data allowed patterns of genetic variation to be modelled. Alleles from Cumbrian and Scottish founders are present in the reintroduced populations. The four sites have levels of variation akin to natural populations and exhibit differentiation as predicted by statistical modelling and comparable with natural populations. This suggests that reintroduction following captive breeding can produce self-sustaining populations with natural levels of genetic diversity. These populations appear to be undergoing the same evolutionary dynamics with bottlenecks and drift as natural populations. Implications for insect conservationReintroduction of captive bred individuals is a viable strategy for producing populations with natural levels of genetic diversity and evolutionary dynamics. Hybridisation of populations on the brink of extinction with those thriving can preserve some of the genetic distinctiveness of the declining population.
Highlights
Reintroductions are commonly used in conservation to offset the ongoing decline in biodiversity (Seddon et al 2007, 2012)
This study aims to determine: (1) if the four populations at the four original reintroduction sites have levels of genetic variation comparable with natural populations (2) how the genetic diversity of the reintroduced populations compares with both the historic one and with the Scottish donor populations. (3) the level of genetic differentiation between the four reintroduction sites after nine generations, 4) whether patterns of genetic variation in the reintroduced populations match the patterns predicted by computer modelling
This study has shown that reintroduction following captive breeding is capable of resulting in self-sustaining populations which behave and respond at a population level in a similar manner to natural populations
Summary
Reintroductions are commonly used in conservation to offset the ongoing decline in biodiversity (Seddon et al 2007, 2012). These were typically undocumented in the scientific literature (Schultz et al 2008). This has changed since the turn of the millennium with reintroductions being the focus of various studies including monitoring (Wakamiya and Roy 2009; Bernardo et al 2011; Nichols and Armstrong 2012), management (Jones and Merton 2012; West et al 2017), range expansion (Halley et al 2012; Gaywood 2018) and population modelling (for summary see Armstrong and Reynolds 2012).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
