Abstract

Forestry joint production choices require clear relative values for multiple, and often conflicting, management objectives. Optimization is most difficult where values of forest attributes are: intangible, non-market, or sensitive. When most mathematical programming models are adapted for non-commensurable objectives, there is little guarantee that vague relative preference sets are met. We demonstrate how an iterative multiple objective programming approach finds preferred joint solutions in a Native American tribal forestry case where marketable outputs are managed in the context of traditional culturally based forest values. Without a priori specification of traditional tribal cultural values, conducting a series of feedback processes does appear to identify more preferable solutions than other types of multiple-objective models that do not use feedback.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call