Abstract

IntroductionThis study aimed to determine the effect of combining positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were pressure intolerant for PAP and were unresponsive to MAD.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed the medical records of severe OSA patients with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30/hr who were diagnosed between October 1, 2008 and June 30, 2014. Patients were initially treated with 2 weeks of PAP, and those who were intolerant to high-pressure PAP (≥15 cm H2O) were switched to 12 weeks of MAD, which is a monobloc designed at 75% of maximum protrusion. Patients who had high residual AHI (≥15/hr) on MAD underwent 12 weeks of combination therapy (CT) with MAD and CPAP and were enrolled in the present study. Enrolled subjects who completed the 12-week CT were followed-up until June 30, 2016.ResultsA total of 14 male patients were included. All three treatments effectively reduced AHI, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and total sleep time with SpO2 <90% (% TST-SpO2<90%) compared to pretreatment values. The residual AHI and ODI on CT was lower than that on MAD or PAP. The residual % TST-SpO2<90% was lower than that on MAD and similar to that on PAP. The therapeutic pressure on CT was on average 9.2 cm H2O lower than that on PAP. For the 11 patients who completed CT, only CT reduced ESS compared to pretreatment value. No treatment had significant impact on % slow wave sleep or overnight change of blood pressure. For patients who completed CT, the average usage was 5.9±1.7 hr/night at 12th week and 6.4±1.5 hr/night at a median follow-up of 36.5-months.ConclusionsCombining MAD and CPAP showed additive effects on reducing AHI and ODI, and lowered the therapeutic pressures.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to determine the effect of combining positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were pressure intolerant for PAP and were unresponsive to MAD

  • The present study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of combining MAD and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in a well-defined cohort of severe OSA patients who were intolerant to high-pressure PAP of !15 cm H2O and had inadequate response to MAD with residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) !15/hr

  • The routine protocol for treating patients with moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI !15/hr) and symptoms requiring PAP treatment was as follows (Fig 1): (1) Patients underwent a 2-week fixed-pressure PAP treatment including CPAP (S8TM) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) (VPAPTM IV, ResMed Inc, New South Wales, Australia) with the therapeutic pressure (PPAP) determined by overnight manual titration; (2) Patients intolerant to PAP were referred to an orthodontist for MAD; (3) Patients on MAD with residual AHI !15/hr after 12-week were switched to combination therapy (CT) of MAD and fixed–pressure CPAP with the therapeutic pressure (PCT) determined by overnight manual titration while the patient was on MAD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the effect of combining positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were pressure intolerant for PAP and were unresponsive to MAD. The standard therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which can effectively improve daytime alertness, functional status, blood pressure (BP), and quality of life [2]. The use of CPAP for !4 hours per night is considered good compliance in terms of lowering BP and improving subjective sleepiness, whereas !6 hr/night is needed to improve daytime function [3, 4]. Pressure intolerance is a common self-reported complaint; the impact of CPAP pressure on compliance has rarely been studied. There is only limited evidence that associates high pressure with poor compliance [11], the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) suggests transitioning CPAP to bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) when the therapeutic pressure of !15 cm H2O is required to eliminate apneahypopnea episodes [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call