Combining low-intensity and maximal exercise test results improves prognostic prediction in chronic heart failure

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigated the combination of maximal and low-intensity exercise testing in predicting prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF), using one single exercise test (two-step protocol). BackgroundRisk assessment based on any single factor has limited accuracy and reproducibility. MethodsTreadmill exercise testing was performed in 202 consecutive CHF patients (174 male; mean age 52 ± 11 years) using “breath-by-breath” gas exchange monitoring. Oxygen uptake (Vo2) kinetics were defined as oxygen deficit (ΔVo2× time [rest to steady state] − Σ Vo2[rest to steady state]) and mean response time (MRT = oxygen-deficit/ΔVo2). Peak Vo2(Vo2max) was defined as the highest Vo2. Mean follow-up was 873 ± 628 days. The primary end point was cardiac mortality and the need for urgent heart transplantation. ResultsForty-four patients (22%) died and 15 (7%) were urgently transplanted. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, MRT >50 s was the most powerful predictor of the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR] 4.44), followed by predicted Vo2max <50% (HR 3.50) and resting systolic blood pressure <105 mm Hg (HR 2.49, all p < 0.001). A majority (n = 130 [64%]) had one or none of these risk factors, with a one-year event rate of only 3%. Patients with two risk factors (n = 45 [22%]) were at medium risk (one-year event rate of 33%). Twenty-seven patients (13%) had all three risk factors, with a one-year event rate of 59%. The area under the curve, using the number of risk factors, was 0.86 ± 0.04 for the primary end point at one year. These results were independent of medication, in particular, beta-blockade. ConclusionsA combination of low-intensity and maximal exercise test results improves assessment of prognosis in patients with CHF.