Abstract

Three basic methods for estimating year-class strength given several research surveys or commercial catch indices of recruitment are described. Two are regression methods - calibration regression and predictive regression. The third method is factor analysis, in which the covariance between the indices is modelled as a function of the relationship to the underlying true, but unobservable, recruitment. All three of the methods estimate recruitment as an inverse variance weighted average of the estimates from each of the index series. Tests indicate that factor analysis and calibration with shrinkage perform best overall. Calibration can be quite sensitive to missing data, however, and may break down if the most recent year's recruitment is far from the mean of the absolute abundance series. Under these conditions, factor analysis performs better in simulation trials. -from Authors

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.