Abstract

Abstract We extend the lowest-order matching of tree-level matrix elements with parton showers to give a complete description at the next higher perturbative accuracy in α s at both small and large jet resolutions, which has not been achieved so far. This requires the combination of the higher-order resummation of large Sudakov logarithms at small values of the jet resolution variable with the full next-to-leading-order (NLO) matrix-element corrections at large values. As a by-product, this combination naturally leads to a smooth connection of the NLO calculations for different jet multiplicities. In this paper, we focus on the general construction of our method and discuss its application to e + e − and pp collisions. We present first results of the implementation in the Geneva Monte Carlo framework. We employ N-jettiness as the jet resolution variable, combining its next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic resummation with fully exclusive NLO matrix elements, and Pythia 8 as the backend for further parton showering and hadronization. For hadronic collisions, we take Drell-Yan production as an example to apply our construction. For e + e − → jets, taking α s (m Z) = 0.1135 from fits to LEP thrust data, together with the Pythia 8 hadronization model, we obtain good agreement with LEP data for a variety of 2-jet observables.

Highlights

  • Accurate and reliable theoretical predictions for measurements at collider experiments require the inclusion of QCD effects beyond the lowest perturbative accuracy in the strong coupling αs

  • We extend the lowest-order matching of tree-level matrix elements with parton showers to give a complete description at the higher perturbative accuracy in αs at both small and large jet resolutions, which has not been achieved so far

  • In the end, providing an accurate description of this transition region requires a careful combination of both types of corrections. Such a Monte Carlo description at relative O(αs) accuracy across phase space has never been achieved and is the subject of our paper. (We briefly summarize the existing efforts to combine NLO corrections with parton showers in section 1.1 below.) The crucial starting point in our approach is that all perturbative inputs to the Monte Carlo are formulated in terms of well-defined physical jet cross sections [3, 4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accurate and reliable theoretical predictions for measurements at collider experiments require the inclusion of QCD effects beyond the lowest perturbative accuracy in the strong coupling αs. In the end, providing an accurate description of this transition region requires a careful combination of both types of corrections Such a Monte Carlo description at relative O(αs) accuracy across phase space has never been achieved and is the subject of our paper. (We briefly summarize the existing efforts to combine NLO corrections with parton showers in section 1.1 below.) The crucial starting point in our approach is that all perturbative inputs to the Monte Carlo are formulated in terms of well-defined physical jet cross sections [3, 4] This allows us to systematically increase the perturbative accuracy by incorporating results for the relevant ingredients to the desired order in fixed-order and resummed perturbation theory.

Previous approaches combining NLO corrections with parton showers
Brief overview of our construction
General construction
Basic setup
Perturbative expansion and order counting
Lowest perturbative accuracy
Next-to-lowest perturbative accuracy
Merging NLO matrix elements with parton shower resummation only
What Monte Carlo can do for resummation
Matched cumulant
Matched spectrum
Perturbative accuracy and order counting
Extension to more jet multiplicities
Attaching parton showering and hadronization
Ingredients
Resummation
Fixed order
Parton shower and hadronization
Partonic results
Showered results
Hadronized results and comparison to data
Predictions for other event shapes
C-parameter
Heavy jet mass
Jet broadening
Application to hadronic collisions
Master formula and ingredients for hadronic collisions
Application to Drell-Yan production
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.