Abstract

BackgroundIran’s Parliament passed a Law in 2010 to merge the existing health insurance schemes to boost risk pooling. Merging can be challenging as there are differences among health insurance schemes in various aspects. This qualitative prospective policy analysis aims to reveal key challenges and implementation barriers of the policy as introduced in Iran.MethodsA qualitative study of key informants and documentary review was conducted. Sixty-seven semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted, with key informants from relevant stakeholders. Purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used for selecting the interviewees. The related policy documents were also reviewed and analyzed to supplement interviews. Data analysis was conducted through an existing health financing World Bank framework.ResultsThis study demonstrated that for combining health insurance funds, operational challenges in the following areas should be taken into account: financing mechanisms, population coverage, benefits package, provider engagement, organizational structure, health service delivery and operational processes. It is also important to have adequate cogent reasons to “the justification of the consolidation process” in the given context. When moving towards combining health insurance funds, especially in countries with a purchaser-provider split, it is critical for policy makers to make sure that the health insurance system is aligned with the policies and Stewardship of the broader health care system.ConclusionsImplementation of major reforms in a health system with fragmented insurance schemes with different target populations, prepayment structures, benefit packages and history of development is inherently difficult, especially when different stakeholders have vetoing powers over the proposed reforms. Solving the differences and operational challenges in the main areas of health insurance system generated in this study may provide a platform for the designing and implementing merging process of social health insurance schemes in Iran and other countries with similar situations.

Highlights

  • Iran’s Parliament passed a Law in 2010 to merge the existing health insurance schemes to boost risk pooling

  • The list was reviewed by members of the research team who were quite familiar with the context of health insurance system in Iran in order to identify and add other likely relevant missed stakeholders (6 more stakeholders)

  • Facing a complex health insurance system with a long history in Iran, the selected framework was not comprehensive enough to cover all aspects of the complexity of merging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Iran’s Parliament passed a Law in 2010 to merge the existing health insurance schemes to boost risk pooling. Merging can be challenging as there are differences among health insurance schemes in various aspects. Consolidation of fragmented risk pools can be considered as a “Herculean task” bearing in mind the proponents (like governments or political parties to gain public support) and opponents (for instance the resistance of personnel and social health insurance (SHI) schemes to lose their autonomy due to disparity in the benefit packages and financial resources among them) [3]. Recent experience from countries like Vietnam, Turkey, South Korea and Thailand worked on reducing fragmentation in health insurance system over the last years shows different degrees of success, considering political challenges and operational obstacles in each country [9,10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call