Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements from a donor, D, to an acceptor, A, fluorophore are frequently used in vitro and in live cells to reveal information on the structure and dynamics of DA labeled macromolecules. Accurate descriptions of FRET measurements by molecular models are complicated because the fluorophores are usually coupled to the macromolecule via flexible long linkers allowing for diffusional exchange between multiple states with different fluorescence properties caused by distinct environmental quenching, dye mobilities, and variable DA distances. It is often assumed for the analysis of fluorescence intensity decays that DA distances and D quenching are uncorrelated (homogeneous quenching by FRET) and that the exchange between distinct fluorophore states is slow (quasistatic). This allows us to introduce the FRET-induced donor decay, εD(t), a function solely depending on the species fraction distribution of the rate constants of energy transfer by FRET, for a convenient joint analysis of fluorescence decays of FRET and reference samples by integrated graphical and analytical procedures. Additionally, we developed a simulation toolkit to model dye diffusion, fluorescence quenching by the protein surface, and FRET. A benchmark study with simulated fluorescence decays of 500 protein structures demonstrates that the quasistatic homogeneous model works very well and recovers for single conformations the average DA distances with an accuracy of < 2%. For more complex cases, where proteins adopt multiple conformations with significantly different dye environments (heterogeneous case), we introduce a general analysis framework and evaluate its power in resolving heterogeneities in DA distances. The developed fast simulation methods, relying on Brownian dynamics of a coarse-grained dye in its sterically accessible volume, allow us to incorporate structural information in the decay analysis for heterogeneous cases by relating dye states with protein conformations to pave the way for fluorescence and FRET-based dynamic structural biology. Finally, we present theories and simulations to assess the accuracy and precision of steady-state and time-resolved FRET measurements in resolving DA distances on the single-molecule and ensemble level and provide a rigorous framework for estimating approximation, systematic, and statistical errors.

Highlights

  • Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments monitor the energy migration from a donor, D, to an acceptor fluorophore, A

  • Accurate descriptions of FRET measurements by molecular models are complicated because the fluorophores are usually coupled to the macromolecule via flexible long linkers allowing for diffusional exchange between multiple states with different fluorescence properties caused by distinct environmental quenching, dye mobilities, and variable DA distances

  • FRET experiments are most sensitive in a distance range 20 to 150 Å qualifying them as a molecular ruler for macromolecules,[2] that has frequently been used to determine DA distance distributions,[3−9] structural models,[2,10−17] and dynamic features[18,19] of biomolecules

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments monitor the energy migration from a donor, D, to an acceptor fluorophore, A. It is crucial for accurate results that the sample is carefully characterized with respect to its purity, its degree of labeling, its homogeneity, and the fluorescence quantum yields of fluorophores.[21] One possibility to overcome ensemble averaging are single-molecule FRET studies that are widely used nowadays.[22−24] They have the key advantage in that they allow one to resolve distributions of FRET observables and to obtain kinetic information at the same time In this way, static (multiple distinguishable static states) and dynamic (interconverting states) heterogeneities can be directly identified. The achievable time resolution of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy can be limited by instrumental factors[25,26] and/or by the photon flux of individual fluoro-

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.