Abstract

To increase the reliability for the non-invasive determination of the irritative zone in presurgical epilepsy diagnosis, we introduce here a new experimental and methodological source analysis pipeline that combines the complementary information in EEG and MEG, and apply it to data from a patient, suffering from refractory focal epilepsy. Skull conductivity parameters in a six compartment finite element head model with brain anisotropy, constructed from individual MRI data, are estimated in a calibration procedure using somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and field (SEF) data. These data are measured in a single run before acquisition of further runs of spontaneous epileptic activity. Our results show that even for single interictal spikes, volume conduction effects dominate over noise and need to be taken into account for accurate source analysis. While cerebrospinal fluid and brain anisotropy influence both modalities, only EEG is sensitive to skull conductivity and conductivity calibration significantly reduces the difference in especially depth localization of both modalities, emphasizing its importance for combining EEG and MEG source analysis. On the other hand, localization differences which are due to the distinct sensitivity profiles of EEG and MEG persist. In case of a moderate error in skull conductivity, combined source analysis results can still profit from the different sensitivity profiles of EEG and MEG to accurately determine location, orientation and strength of the underlying sources. On the other side, significant errors in skull modeling are reflected in EEG reconstruction errors and could reduce the goodness of fit to combined datasets. For combined EEG and MEG source analysis, we therefore recommend calibrating skull conductivity using additionally acquired SEP/SEF data.

Highlights

  • Epilepsy surgery is an important option to treat pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy and its success depends heavily on the correct determination of the epileptogenic zone

  • The head models are used in source analysis scenarios for the somatosensory evoked responses as well as, in subsection two, for evaluating the epileptic activity using single modality EEG or MEG or combined EEG/ MEG source analysis scenarios

  • The source location x) and the orientation o2) of Algorithm 2 are hardly depending on the skull conductivity parameter, while skull conductivity, residual variance (RV), and source strength m2 are closely related to each other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Epilepsy surgery is an important option to treat pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy and its success depends heavily on the correct determination of the epileptogenic zone. The FEM allows high flexibility in modeling the EEG and MEG forward problem in geometrically complicated inhomogeneous and anisotropic head volume conductors (see recent review in [6]) In this way, we expect to significantly improve the synergistic effects of EEG and MEG, leading to more reliable source reconstructions in the field of presurgical epilepsy diagnosis and in other application fields of source analysis. We expect to significantly improve the synergistic effects of EEG and MEG, leading to more reliable source reconstructions in the field of presurgical epilepsy diagnosis and in other application fields of source analysis This is the first source analysis study for simultaneously measured EEG and MEG of epileptic activity using an individual, conductivity calibrated six compartment high resolution FE model of the patient’s head. The total amount of acquisition time required for T1w-, T2w- and DT-MRI scans was 27 minutes (approximately 9 minutes each)

Registration and segmentation of T1w and T2w
1.11 Skull conductivity calibration procedure using SEP and SEF data
Results
Evaluation of interictal epileptic activity
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call