Abstract

Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MR‐EPT) is a technique used to estimate the conductivity and permittivity of tissues from MR measurements of the transmit magnetic field. Different reconstruction methods are available; however, all these methods present several limitations, which hamper the clinical applicability. Standard Helmholtz‐based MR‐EPT methods are severely affected by noise. Iterative reconstruction methods such as contrast source inversion electrical properties tomography (CSI‐EPT) are typically time‐consuming and are dependent on their initialization. Deep learning (DL) based methods require a large amount of training data before sufficient generalization can be achieved. Here, we investigate the benefits achievable using a hybrid approach, that is, using MR‐EPT or DL‐EPT as initialization guesses for standard 3D CSI‐EPT. Using realistic electromagnetic simulations at 3 and 7 T, the accuracy and precision of hybrid CSI reconstructions are compared with those of standard 3D CSI‐EPT reconstructions. Our results indicate that a hybrid method consisting of an initial DL‐EPT reconstruction followed by a 3D CSI‐EPT reconstruction would be beneficial. DL‐EPT combined with standard 3D CSI‐EPT exploits the power of data‐driven DL‐based EPT reconstructions, while the subsequent CSI‐EPT facilitates a better generalization by providing data consistency.

Highlights

  • We show that an accurate initialization guess provided by Deep learning (DL)-electrical properties tomography (EPT) improves contrast source inversion (CSI)-EPT reconstructions, while contrast source inversion electrical properties tomography (CSI-EPT) has the potential to improve tissue structure of deep learning-electrical properties tomography (DL-EPT) reconstructions

  • We investigated the possible benefits for electrical properties (EPs) reconstructions achievable by combining standard Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MR-EPT), DL-EPT, and 3D CSI-EPT (H-CSI) into a hybrid reconstruction approach, that is, by providing MR-EPT or DL-EPT reconstructions as an initialization guess for CSI-EPT

  • Reconstructions obtained with CSI-EPT depend on the map provided as initialization guess

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge of in vivo tissue electrical properties (EPs: conductivity σ and relative permittivity εr) is of high interest for different applications such as improving the local specific absorption rate quantification used in, for example, hyperthermia treatment planning or safety assessment in MRI.[1,2] due to the relation between conductivity and ionic content, in vivo measurements of tissue EPs can in principle provide clinical information about pathological tissues, making them a potentially useful biomarker for diagnostic purposes and treatment monitoring.[3,4]There have been several approaches to measure in vivo tissue electrical properties noninvasively.[5,6] In 1991, the possibility of r(etrie)ving tissue electrical properties in the radio-frequency range from MR measurements of the circularly polarized transmit magnetic field B +1 has been shown.[7]. This technique was referred to as electrical properties tomography (EPT).[8,9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.