Abstract

In the face of dramatic climate change and human pressure acting on remaining forest areas across tropical, temperate and boreal biomes, there has emerged a coordinated effort to identify and protect forests that are currently considered “intact”. These forests are hypothesized to be more resilient to future abiotic perturbations than fragmented or degraded forests and, therefore, will provide more reliable carbon storage and/or biodiversity services into an uncertain future. Research in the fields of contemporary and palaeoecology can offer valuable insights to enhance our ability to assess resilience of forests and whether these would be comparable across forest biomes. Contemporary ecological monitoring has been able to capture processes acting over the short-to-medium term, while palaeoecological methods allow us to derive insights of the long-term processes affecting forest dynamics. Recent efforts to both identify intact forests, based on area definitions, and assess vegetation climate sensitivity globally have relied on satellite imagery analysis for the time period 2000-2013. In this paper, we compare these published datasets and do find that on average intact forests in boreal and tropical biomes are less sensitive to temperature and water availability, respectively; however, the patterns are less clear within biomes (e.g. across continents). By taking a longer perspective, through palaeoecology, we present several studies that show a range of forest responses to past climatic and human disturbance, suggesting that short-term trends may not be reliable predictors of long-term resilience. We highlight that few contemporary and palaeoecology studies have considered forest area when assessing resilience and those that have did find that smaller forest areas exhibited greater dynamism in species composition, which could be a proxy for declining resilience. Climatic conditions in the Anthropocene will be pushing forest systems across biomes into novel climates very rapidly and with current knowledge it is difficult to predict how forests will react in the immediate term, which is the most relevant timeframe for global efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIntact forests (i.e., that have not experienced large-scale anthropogenic disturbance) have been highlighted as being valuable for conservation due to a number of unique attributes and services, such as climate change mitigation, local to regional weather regulation, invaluable biodiversity habitat, clean water provision, support of dependent indigenous cultures as well as wider benefits for human health (Watson et al, 2018)

  • Intact forests have been highlighted as being valuable for conservation due to a number of unique attributes and services, such as climate change mitigation, local to regional weather regulation, invaluable biodiversity habitat, clean water provision, support of dependent indigenous cultures as well as wider benefits for human health (Watson et al, 2018)

  • The analysis we present is based on a contemporary measure of climate sensitivity developed by Seddon et al (2016) partitioned into intact and non-intact forest areas using the intact forest landscapes (IFL) dataset generated by Potapov et al (2017) and forest cover dataset produced by Hansen et al (2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intact forests (i.e., that have not experienced large-scale anthropogenic disturbance) have been highlighted as being valuable for conservation due to a number of unique attributes and services, such as climate change mitigation, local to regional weather regulation, invaluable biodiversity habitat, clean water provision, support of dependent indigenous cultures as well as wider benefits for human health (Watson et al, 2018). Are there particular types of disturbance that might make a forest ecosystem more resilient over time and is the impact of early Neolithic cultures relevant for the designation of intact forest areas today (Barlow et al, 2012; Willis et al, 2018)? We will discuss these methodologies in the context of the intact forest landscape (IFL) metric (Potapov et al, 2017) to explore: (i) how are intact forests responding to disturbance and climate change, (ii) is it possible to distinguish natural variability of a forest ecosystem from increasing variability due to reduced resilience, (iii) are there common mechanisms underpinning resilience across biomes, and (iv) do larger forest patch areas confer resilience?

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call