Abstract

PurposeThe closure of midline in abdominal wall incisional hernias is an essential principle. In some exceptional circumstances, despite adequate component separation techniques, this midline closure cannot be achieved. This study aims to review the results of using both anterior and component separation in these exceptional cases.MethodsWe reviewed our experience using the combination of both anterior and posterior component separation in the attempt to close the midline. Our first step was to perform a TAR and a complete extensive dissection of the retromuscular preperitoneal plane developed laterally as far as the posterior axillary line. When the closure of midline was not possible, an external oblique release was made. A retromuscular preperitoneal reinforcement was made with the combination of an absorbable mesh and a 50 × 50 polypropylene mesh.ResultsTwelve patients underwent anterior and posterior component separation. The mean hernia width was 23.5 ± 5. The majority were classified as severe complex incisional hernia and had previous attempts of repair. After a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 8–45), no case of recurrence was registered. Only one patient (8.33%) presented with an asymptomatic bulging in the follow-up. European Hernia Society’s quality of life scores showed a significant improvement at 2 years postoperatively in the three domains: pain (p = 0.01), restrictions (p = 0.04) and cosmetic (p = 0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of posterior and anterior component separation can effectively treat massive and challenging cases of abdominal wall reconstruction in which the primary midline closure is impossible to achieve despite appropriate optimization of surgery.

Highlights

  • Incisional hernias (IH) are a frequent complication after midline laparotomies

  • Half the hernia sac was left attached to the anterior rectus sheath, and the other half was left attached to the contralateral posterior rectus sheath

  • Ten (83.3%) were M1–M5 according to European Hernia Society (EHS) classification, and two (16.7%) presented a concomitant lateral incisional hernia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Incisional hernias (IH) are a frequent complication after midline laparotomies. A number of IH are considered complex because of size, location, domain loss, previous operations, the presence of stomas or infection, and comorbidities [1, 2]. The main goal of surgical repair of midline IH is to obtain a complete fascial approximation, with an appropriate mesh reinforcement. Albanese first described ACS by releasing the insertion of external oblique muscles [3]. Ramirez implemented this technique in a cadaver study, which combined medial posterior rectus sheath release with external oblique detachment [4]. Later, this technique was effectively used with mesh reinforcement [5,6,7]. A main issue with this technique was morbidity associated with the wound, due to

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call