Abstract

Abstract. During recent years, numerical ensemble prediction systems have become an important tool for estimating the uncertainties of dynamical and physical processes as represented in numerical weather models. The latest generation of limited area ensemble prediction systems (LAM-EPSs) allows for probabilistic forecasts at high resolution in both space and time. However, these systems still suffer from systematic deficiencies. Especially for nowcasting (0–6 h) applications the ensemble spread is smaller than the actual forecast error. This paper tries to generate probabilistic short range 2-m temperature forecasts by combining a state-of-the-art nowcasting method and a limited area ensemble system, and compares the results with statistical methods. The Integrated Nowcasting Through Comprehensive Analysis (INCA) system, which has been in operation at the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) since 2006 (Haiden et al., 2011), provides short range deterministic forecasts at high temporal (15 min–60 min) and spatial (1 km) resolution. An INCA Ensemble (INCA-EPS) of 2-m temperature forecasts is constructed by applying a dynamical approach, a statistical approach, and a combined dynamic-statistical method. The dynamical method takes uncertainty information (i.e. ensemble variance) from the operational limited area ensemble system ALADIN-LAEF (Aire Limitée Adaptation Dynamique Développement InterNational Limited Area Ensemble Forecasting) which is running operationally at ZAMG (Wang et al., 2011). The purely statistical method assumes a well-calibrated spread-skill relation and applies ensemble spread according to the skill of the INCA forecast of the most recent past. The combined dynamic-statistical approach adapts the ensemble variance gained from ALADIN-LAEF with non-homogeneous Gaussian regression (NGR) which yields a statistical \\mbox{correction} of the first and second moment (mean bias and dispersion) for Gaussian distributed continuous variables. Validation results indicate that all three methods produce sharp and reliable probabilistic 2-m temperature forecasts. However, the statistical and combined dynamic-statistical methods slightly outperform the pure dynamical approach, mainly due to the under-dispersive behavior of ALADIN-LAEF outside the nowcasting range. The training length does not have a pronounced impact on forecast skill, but a spread re-scaling improves the forecast skill substantially. Refinements of the statistical methods yield a slight further improvement.

Highlights

  • In numerical weather prediction (NWP), the use of ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) has become the standard method of accounting for uncertainties in initial conditions and model formulations

  • The aim of this study is to develop proper methods to quantify these uncertainties and to provide sharp and reliable site-specific, probabilistic short range forecasts of 2-m temperature

  • The statistical and the coupled dynamic-statistical approaches give slightly better results than the pure dynamical method, i.e. statistical adaptations are able to overcome the under-dispersive behavior of the limited area ensemble system, at least from +12 h onwards

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In numerical weather prediction (NWP), the use of ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) has become the standard method of accounting for uncertainties in initial conditions and model formulations. Dance et al (2010), for example, describe a system which predicts thunderstorm strike probability using a bivariate Gaussian model of speed and direction errors of the cell tracking method employed They show that the skill of the system in predicting threat areas exceeds that of the corresponding deterministic advection forecast. Using a set of hourly initialized Rapid Update Cycle forecasts, Lu et al (2007) are able to improve NWP very short-range (1– 3 h) forecasts of meteorological fields compared to the deterministic forecasts. The improvements in this case appear to result mainly from the correction of model errors due to initial spin-up.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call