Abstract
The authors conjecture that a proper combination of partial-band tone jamming (PBTJ) and full-band noise jamming (FBNJ) under a given total jamming power constraint may be more effective than PBTJ alone, not only for the case with a low (E/sub s//N/sub J/), but also for the case with high E/sub s//N/sub J/, since the FBNJ can corrupt the jamming state information (JSI). Assuming this combination of PBTJ and FBNJ jamming, they consider three cases of receiver processing-the hard decision (HD) metric without JSI, the HD metric with perfect JSI, and the maximum-likelihood (ML) metric using Viterbi's ratio threshold (VRT) to generate a 1-b symbol decision quality indicator. System performance is evaluated in terms of the Chernoff bound on the probability of symbol error. From extensive numerical analysis the authors conclude that, for the case of the HD metric without JSI, PBTJ-only jamming is the worst form of jamming, as expected, since the receiver does not use JSI at all; for the other cases, a combination of PBTJ and FBNJ is the worst, with the worst ratio of PBTJ power to FBNJ power a function of the values of M and E/sub s//N/sub J/.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
