Abstract

Abstract. The passive solar remote sensing of cloud properties over highly reflecting ground is challenging, mostly due to the low contrast between the cloud reflectivity and that of the underlying surfaces (sea ice and snow). Uncertainties in the retrieved cloud optical thickness τ and cloud droplet effective radius reff, C may arise from uncertainties in the assumed spectral surface albedo, which is mainly determined by the generally unknown effective snow grain size reff, S. Therefore, in a first step the effects of the assumed snow grain size are systematically quantified for the conventional bispectral retrieval technique of τ and reff, C for liquid water clouds. In general, the impact of uncertainties of reff, S is largest for small snow grain sizes. While the uncertainties of retrieved τ are independent of the cloud optical thickness and solar zenith angle, the bias of retrieved reff, C increases for optically thin clouds and high Sun. The largest deviations between the retrieved and true original values are found with 83 % for τ and 62 % for reff, C. In the second part of the paper a retrieval method is presented that simultaneously derives all three parameters (τ, reff, C, reff, S) and therefore accounts for changes in the snow grain size. Ratios of spectral cloud reflectivity measurements at the three wavelengths λ1 = 1040 nm (sensitive to reff, S), λ2 = 1650 nm (sensitive to τ), and λ3 = 2100 nm (sensitive to reff, C) are combined in a trispectral retrieval algorithm. In a feasibility study, spectral cloud reflectivity measurements collected by the Spectral Modular Airborne Radiation measurement sysTem (SMART) during the research campaign Vertical Distribution of Ice in Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds (VERDI, April/May 2012) were used to test the retrieval procedure. Two cases of observations above the Canadian Beaufort Sea, one with dense snow-covered sea ice and another with a distinct snow-covered sea ice edge are analysed. The retrieved values of τ, reff, C, and reff, S show a continuous transition of cloud properties across snow-covered sea ice and open water and are consistent with estimates based on satellite data. It is shown that the uncertainties of the trispectral retrieval increase for high values of τ, and low reff, S but nevertheless allow the effective snow grain size in cloud-covered areas to be estimated.

Highlights

  • During boreal winter, 15 % of the Earth’s surface is covered by snow and sea ice (Vaughan et al, 2013), while clouds cover roughly two-thirds of the globe (Boucher et al, 2013)

  • Uncertainties in the retrieved cloud optical thickness τ and cloud droplet effective radius reff,C may arise from uncertainties in the assumed spectral surface albedo, which is mainly determined by the generally unknown effective snow grain size reff,S

  • The retrieval of cloud properties using spectral reflected solar radiation may be biased significantly if the clouds are located over a snow surface or sea ice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

15 % of the Earth’s surface is covered by snow and sea ice (Vaughan et al, 2013), while clouds cover roughly two-thirds of the globe (Boucher et al, 2013). For satellite observations of spectral solar radiation, retrieval algorithms that provide effective snow grain size have been developed by Painter et al (2009) and Zege et al (2011). The retrieval methods by Painter et al (2009) and Zege et al (2011) use these sensitivities and estimate the black carbon concentration in the snow, which mostly affects the visible range of the spectral albedo These satellite retrievals of snow properties do not cover the full spatial and temporal evolution of effective snow grain size and snow albedo as they are limited to cloud-free areas (Lyapustin et al, 2009; Zege et al, 2011).

Forward simulations
Snow grain size effect on cloud retrieval results
Separating the spectral signatures of liquid water clouds and snow
Selected wavelengths and radiance-ratios
Retrieval grid
Adjustments and uncertainty estimation
Application to airborne measurements
Case I – 29 April 2012
Case II – 17 May 2012
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call