Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for response assessment post curative-intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC).MethodsConsecutive ASCC patients treated with curative-intent CRT at a single centre between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively identified. Clinical meta-data including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collated. Three radiologists evaluated PET-CT and MRI using qualitative response assessment criteria and agreed in consensus. Two-proportion z test was used to compare diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy). Kaplan-Meier analysis (Mantel-Cox log-rank) was performed.ResultsMRI (accuracy 76%, PPV 44.8%, NPV 95.7%) and PET-CT (accuracy 69.3%, PPV 36.7%, NPV 91.1%) performance metrics were similar; when combined, there were statistically significant improvements (accuracy 94.7%, PPV 78.9%, NPV 100%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in PFS between responders and non-responders at PET-CT (p = 0.007), MRI (p = 0.005), and consensus evaluation (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated a lower hazard ratio (HR) and narrower 95% confidence intervals for consensus findings (HR = 0.093, p < 0.001). Seventy-five patients, of which 52 (69.3%) were females, with median follow-up of 17.8 months (range 5–32.6) were included. Fifteen of the 75 (20%) had persistent anorectal and/or nodal disease after CRT. Three patients died, median time to death 6.2 months (range 5–18.3).ConclusionCombined PET-CT and MRI response assessment post-CRT better predicts subsequent outcome than either modality alone. This could have valuable clinical benefits by guiding personalised risk-adapted patient follow-up.Key Points• MRI and PET-CT performance metrics for assessing response following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) were similar.• Combined MRI and PET-CT treatment response assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC was demonstrated to be superior to either modality alone.• A combined MRI and PET-CT assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC has the potential to improve accuracy and guide optimal patient management with a greater ability to predict outcome than either modality alone

Highlights

  • Anal cancer is rare, accounting for 1.5% of digestive tract cancers with a worldwide incidence of 1 in 100,000 and rising prevalence in developed countries [1–3]

  • Combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) treatment response assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) was demonstrated to be superior to either modality alone

  • Ninety percent are of squamous cell histology (ASCC), with the most prevalent risk factor being human papillomavirus (HPV) [4–7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anal cancer is rare, accounting for 1.5% of digestive tract cancers with a worldwide incidence of 1 in 100,000 and rising prevalence in developed countries [1–3]. Ninety percent are of squamous cell histology (ASCC), with the most prevalent risk factor being human papillomavirus (HPV) [4–7]. Diagnosis and local staging are performed with a combination of physical examination, digital rectal examination, biopsy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mainstay of curative treatment for non-metastatic ASCC includes external-beam radiotherapy with concurrent mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine [10]. A recent prospective, national cohort study using contemporary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) techniques reported 1-year overall survival (OS) rates of 94%, disease-free survival (DFS) of 84% and colostomy-free survival at 86% [11]. Surgical treatment is largely reserved for salvage therapy in cases of CRT failure or recurrence. Post-CRT follow-up assessment, including high-quality imaging, is of key importance for early identification of residual or recurrent disease

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call