Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates (113 isolates from 78 patients) were typed using IS 6110-RFLP, DR-RFLP, DR-based spoligotyping and direct repetitive element PCR (DRE-PCR). The similarities among isolates were compared for each individual method. The individual matrix distance files for each method were summed and averaged, and the resulting unique distance file was analysed by the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages). Combined numerical analysis with 3 genetic markers (IS 6110-RFLP, DR-RFLP and spoligotyping) was performed for all 78 clinical isolates, whereas analysis with 4 genetic markers (with the addition of DRE-PCR) was performed on the 10 main clusters described. When compared to molecular analysis based on individual markers, the molecular description based on multiple genetic markers enabled comparison of the results obtained by individual methods and the obtaining of a more accurate view of strain identity and clusters comparison. The resulting cumulative dendrogram was more accurate for studying the population structure of M. tuberculosis and may be a good tool for elucidating intraspecies genetic microevolution.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.