Abstract
There is a pressing need for shallow bathymetry in regions around the world, including in fragile marine ecosystems, such as coral reefs. Unfortunately, mapping these shallow-water areas using in situ or boat-based methods is expensive, time consuming, and potentially dangerous, due to the need to put personnel and/or boats in high-energy nearshore areas, which may contain rocks, reefs, and other submerged hazards. For this reason, passive remote sensing methods of shallow bathymetric mapping have been rapidly growing in interest and usage. Two general categories of approaches using passive imaging can be distinguished as: (1) those based on geometry (stereo-photogrammetry); (2) those based on radiometry (attenuation of light in the water column). These two broad categories of approaches have been tested on imagery collected using aircraft and satellites in numerous previous studies. Recent work within the geometric category includes processing unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery using Structure from Motion and Multi-View Stereo (SfM-MVS) photogrammetry, while radiometric methods encompass the broad range of spectral bathymetry retrieval algorithms. Each broad approach category has advantages and disadvantages. Fortunately, the geometric and radiometric approaches are highly complementary. The geometric approaches tend to work best in areas of high bottom texture, which facilitates feature matching in the SfM-MVS software. Meanwhile, the radiometric approaches work best in relatively homogeneous bottom types. To leverage the strengths of each type of approach and overcome their respective weaknesses, this work develops and tests a combined geometric-radiometric bathymetric mapping approach designed for shallow-water mapping from UAS imagery. Four radiometric models of varying complexity are tested, ranging from a color-based lookup table approach to neural networks. Two UAS flights on Buck Island, off St Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), are used to assess the accuracy of the methodology when compared to aerial bathymetric lidar data. The results show that the combined geometric-radiometric approach provides an increase in spatial coverage of up to 61% and improvement (i.e. decrease) in 95th percentile error of up to 49% when compared to traditional refraction-corrected SfM-MVS bathymetry.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have